Michigan District Export Council
    
Michigan's Export Source
www.ExportMichigan.com  
 

Hot Links

Free Counseling
It doesn't matter whether it's as close as Windsor or as far as Hong Kong or Zimbabwe, the Michigan District Export Council has someone who's been there and done that.  We encourage you to give us a try.

 

Washtenaw County FY 04

International Business Economic Impact Assessment

Executive Summary

Prepared by Ellen Cynar, Lewis and Clark University Summer Intern


As Washtenaw County increases in its size and capacity, so too does the county’s impact on the global economy. While many assume that United States international business transactions take place in highly developed, urban areas, such an assessment does not account for the strong connections that smaller economic areas, such as Washtenaw County, have; these counties have the capability to produce and connect with the global marketplace. Washtenaw County is highly involved with international business, and various characteristics of the area make Washtenaw’s international economic impact even stronger. The success of Washtenaw County is attributed to its educated workforce, proximity to major transportation centers, and its strong business community.

This study attempts to gage Washtenaw County’s current international economic impact and predict future trends in international business that will impact the county. The study focuses on both exports and education via local institutions. This report does not account for international service from the county because of the difficulty in tracking such transactions. The study also does not attempt to gage the impact of foreign subsidiaries or franchises abroad.

Washtenaw County has been faced with many economic challenges in regards to its exports. The current slowdown in the domestic economy, especially in the manufacturing industry, and current political events have challenged the ability for Washtenaw products to be exported, and international students to enter the United States. Washtenaw County seems to be weathering these challenges well however, and its emphasis of technology rich products and its strong education institutions have let the county continue to benefit from the international perspective. Local firms and educational institutions that are flexible, versatile, and able to leverage past export experience across a range of markets are likely to succeed in the international marketplace.

Washtenaw County Overview

Located 40 miles outside of Detroit, Michigan and covering 710 square miles, Washtenaw County is the sixth largest county in Michigan. As of July 2003, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the population of Washtenaw County totals 338,562 and the county’s largest city, Ann Arbor, has an estimated population of 114,498.[1] From 1990 to 2000 the county grew 14.1% in population size. More than half of Washtenaw County’s total population lives within the City of Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti Township. Nearly 70% of the population lives within four jurisdictions including the City of Ann Arbor, the City of Ypsilanti, Ypsilanti Township, and Pittsfield Township.

As of 2002, Washtenaw County has a civilian labor force of 176,217 with 167,647 people currently employed. Washtenaw County’s 2002 unemployment rate, 4.9%, is considerably lower than that of Michigan’s, which is 8.7%. According to the 2000 Metropolitan Area Exports Study, U.S. Department of Commerce, Ann Arbor is the 4th largest exporting area in Michigan and within the top 100 in the United States with the export value totaling over $1.746 billion in 1999.[2]

According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent and available study in 1997, there are a total of 555 manufacturers and/or software publishers in Washtenaw County.[3] As of 2004, there are about 202 known exporting firms in Ann Arbor, followed by 24 in Dexter, and 16 in Ypsilanti. Saline hosts 18 exporting firms, and Chelsea has a total of 6.[4] Part of Washtenaw County’s high level of exporting comes from the unique pull-through effect of the large automotive presence in the area.

The Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center wishes to recognize the efforts of Washtenaw County exporters. The Presidents "E" Award was created in December of 1961 by Executive Order, to afford suitable recognition to persons, firms, or organizations which contribute significantly in the effort to increase United States exports. The Presidents "E Star" Award, which began in August 1969 by the Secretary of Commerce, affords continuing recognition of noteworthy promotion efforts. There have been several Washtenaw County firms who have received one of both of these awards. Mechanical Dynamics (currently MSC software) has received both The Presidents "E" Award and The Presidents "E Star" Award, as well as Pahl Sciences (now Gelman), Terumo Cardiovascular Systems (previously Sarns), and Sycor (purchased by Nortel Networks). Firms awarded The Presidents "E" Award include American Broach and Machine Company, Whatman (previously Arbor Technologies / out of business), and Buhr Machine Tool Company (out of business).

Export Markets and Industries

The top five Washtenaw County export sectors are computer software, computer hardware, machine tools, laboratory equipment, and medical equipment. According to the Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center, Department of Commerce database, computer software has the largest number of exporters by far with a total of 98 firms, computer hardware comes in second with 33 exporting firms, the medical equipment sector hosts 23 firms exporting in the county followed by machine tools with 15 firms, and laboratory equipment with a total of 15 firms. More than 70% of the exporters are technology related.

The top export markets for Washtenaw County differ slightly than that of the export markets for the U.S. and Michigan. Exports from the U.S. and Michigan go overwhelmingly to Canada, Mexico, Japan, and other technologically rich countries of the European Union. While this holds true for Washtenaw County, other less traditional countries are involved as well, including Australia, and China. The reason for this difference in export markets is the high level of computer technology products from Washtenaw County, particularly from Ann Arbor.

 

Canada

The bilateral relationship between the United States and Canada is the largest economic relationship that has ever existed between two nations.[5] In 2002, two-way trade in goods and services between the United States and Canada amounted to US$432 billion, or over $1 billion a day. In fields ranging from environmental cooperation to free trade, the two countries have set the standard by which many other countries measure their own progress. In 2003, over 85% of Canadian exports came to the United States and over 72% of Canadian imports came from the United States. In 2003, U.S. exports into Canada (goods and services) totaled approximately $195.3 billion, up from $188 billion in 2002. On a local level, Michigan leads all states in exports to Canada, totaling over $27 billion in 2003; Michigan is Canada’s 2nd largest trading partner, next to the United States. Further, more than 8% of U.S. exports to Canada come from Michigan.[6]

Washtenaw County exports find a welcome home in Canada. Washtenaw County’s number one industry, computer software, and number two industry, computer hardware, rank number three and five respectively for most potential in exporting to Canada; U.S. companies are the dominant suppliers of computer software to Canada. In 2003, the U.S. exported to Canada approximately $3.1 billion in computer software and approximately $3.4 billion in computer hardware.[7] Medical equipment, Washtenaw County’s number three industry also has great possibilities, ranking number 11 in export potential to Canada. In 2003, the U.S. exported approximately $1.3 billion in medical equipment to Canada.[8] Washtenaw County and U.S. exports are slated to have continued success in Canada due to the decrease in tariffs thanks to NAFTA, the increasing openness to foreign investment, deep cultural and historical ties, strong awareness of business and technological developments in the U.S., and general geographic proximity.

Mexico

The relationship between the United States and Mexico is of the utmost importance for both countries. A mixture of mutual interests, shared problems, economic disparities, a 2,000 mile border, and cultural relations shape the relationship between the U.S. and Mexico.[9] The Mexican economy, after facing a recession, has shown positive growth in the past 2 years and Mexico’s recovery will continue to be inextricably linked to U.S. economic performance. In 2002, the United States accounted for $143,059 million, or 88%, of Mexico’s exports and provided $106,660 million, or 63%, of Mexico’s imports.[10] Mexico is now the second most important U.S. trading partner after Canada and U.S. exports to Mexico are greater than U.S. exports to the rest of Latin America combined. Due to NAFTA and the fact the Mexico remains committed to the path of economic integration, Mexico is increasingly the destination for Washtenaw County exports. Mexico’s characteristics combined with a growing demand for computer software and other technology-based products suggest a continuing market for the county. Mexico is the number two export market for both U.S computer hardware and software. In 2003, U.S. computer hardware exports to Mexico is estimated at $2.5 billion. In 2000, U.S. exports of computer software totaled $4.6 billion.[11] 

China

China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 marked a new direction for China’s economy. With its new membership and integration into the world economy, China is slowly transitioning from a planned economy to a market based economy. After China’s entrance into the WTO, American exports grew 15% in 2002 and since 1990, U.S. exports to China grow approximately 12% annually. In 2002, China imported $27 billion from the U.S., or 3.3% of total U.S. exports. China is America’s sixth largest export market.[12]

Although the Chinese market is one of great potential, it remains medium-sized and unpredictable. China lacks both transparency and a consistent body of laws and regulations. China’s membership in the WTO will hopefully continue to help open Chinese markets to foreign firms, lower tariffs, and provide for stronger protection of intellectually property rights. Unfortunately, many Chinese firms have remained relatively small, under-capitalized, and are poorly managed. Furthermore, with a population of $1.3 billion and a GDP of USD $1.24 trillion, there is little disposable income for Chinese citizens. Pockets of economic success have started to grow in China, however, and with China’s participation in the WTO, American companies will have growing access to Chinese markets.[13]

Washtenaw County has and will continue to benefit from the Chinese market especially with China’s entrance into the WTO and successful bid for the 2008 Olympics. Computer software is the number three leading Chinese sectors for U.S. exports, coinciding nicely with Washtenaw County’s number one export industry. In 2002, China imported $195 million in U.S. computer software. U.S. computer software exporters will also be able to gain from software tariffs that were reduced to zero in 2003. China has also issued a number of policies ranging from export incentives to value-added tax rebates and financial assistance to small businesses, as well as laws addressing intellectual property rights protection.[14] Piracy will continue to be an issue for U.S. companies in China.

Australia

Australia finished the last decade as the world’s second fastest growing developed economy averaging a growth of 4% a year. American company names are commonplace in the Australian market, and U.S. companies are Australia’s largest source of investment. Total trade between the U.S. and Australia totaled $47 billion in 2002 and Australia is one of Washtenaw County’s top export destinations.[15] American companies are drawn to the Australian market because of its familiar institutions, quality infrastructure, stable legal and political system, common language, excellent communications and transportation infrastructure, high living standard, and sophisticated financial system. Because Australia is quick to adapt to high-tech products and services and extensively uses the Internet, Australia is a prime target for Washtenaw County exports. Computer software, computer hardware, and medical equipment are number two, three, and four respectively for leading sectors in Australia for U.S. exports and investment. In 2003, the U.S. exported to Australia an estimated $3 billion in computer hardware, $2.2 billion in computer software, and $547 million in medical equipment.[16] The Australian software market has grown at approximately eight percent over the last two years. Above all, American companies will always find Australia a welcoming and attractive place to do business. Barriers are far and few, especially with the signing of the Australia- U.S. Free Trade Agreement on May 18, 2004.[17]

France

France is the United States’ eighth largest trading partner as well as one of Washtenaw County’s top export destinations.[18] The impressive recent growth and continued expected expansion can be attributed to France’s membership of the G-8, The European Union, The World Trade Organization and the OECD. Despite political differences, especially with the Iraq War in 2003, France and the U.S. are long-standing trade allies. Currently, France has the third largest Information Technology (IT) market in Western Europe, after Germany and the United Kingdom, and it was valued at $48.2 billion in 2002.[19] France is therefore an area of interest for Washtenaw County exports. Computer software is the number two "best prospect" for U.S. business in France. France is the number two destination for software exports in Washtenaw County and there are 27 firms in the county exporting to France. U.S. computer software exports to France totaled $4.2 billion in 2002.[20] Computer hardware is the number six “best prospect” for U.S. exports in France. Computer expenditures in France significantly slowed down in 2002 and it is attributed to the burst of the Internet bubble, followed by a recession. U.S. hardware producers should still be optimistic however, as total U.S. exports to France was $1.9 billion in 2002, and is expected to be $2.365 billion in 2003.[21] Medical equipment and laboratory equipment are ranked 9th and 10th for "best prospects" in France, which are the number 3 and 5 export sectors in Washtenaw County, respectively. The forecast for the scientific laboratory equipment remains positive; total U.S. laboratory equipment exports to France was $937 million in 2002 and is expected to be $1.171 billion in 2003.[22] The medical equipment sector should also expect similar growth, due to population growth and longer life expectancy in France. The medical equipment sector of France is highly dependent upon imports from the U.S., especially with a social security system that covers the majority of the medical expenses for the French population. Total U.S. medical equipment exports to France was $812 million in 2002, and is expected to be $852 million in 2003.[23]

Future and Current Trends in Local Exports - The Survey

Firms in Washtenaw County who are known international exporters were asked to participate in an International Economic Impact Study developed by the Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center, U.S. Department of Commerce. The sampled firms were asked to respond to a series of questions pertaining to international business. The top five industries responsible for international trade in the county include Computer Software, Computer Hardware, Medical Equipment, Machine Tools, and Lab Equipment, and were therefore the sampled industries.

Firms were first asked to respond to the impact that international trade has on their businesses on a 5-point sliding scale: no impact, little impact, some impact, strong impact, and very strong impact. The firms generally responded that international sales have some sort of impact on their business. The responding firms reported anywhere from 1-66% of their business comes from international sales. The most frequent responses were between 25% and 45%.


The firms were then asked to respond to the impact of the following events on their business’s international trade:

  • September the 11th
  • Afghanistan War
  • Iraq War
  • Current events in the Middle East
  • Fluctuation of national security levels

The responses are as follows:

  • September the 11th: Firms responded heavily with some impact. 
  • Afghanistan War: Most firms responded with little or no impact.
  • Iraq War: Most firms responded equally with some, little or no impact.
  • Current events in the Middle East: Firms responded equally with some, little, or no impact.
  • Fluctuation of national security levels: Firms responded strongly with some, little, or no impact.

The firms generally commented that current economic and political conditions do not have a direct effect on their business, but they do have an indirect effect. The firms experienced a slowdown of shipments due to extra paperwork, a decrease in potential commercial contracts, additional costs of security charges, increased scrutiny of export licenses, and reworking of packaging for shipping. Only a very small percent of the responding firms have experienced business due to sales from the rebuilding of Iraq or the Iraq War.


The firms were asked if the news of potential threats to American interests abroad has influenced or inhibited international business travel by their firms (trade show attendance, meetings, etc.). The surveyed firms mostly responded that the threats have not affected their business travel, although a couple did respond in the affirmative. One firm experienced difficulty getting visas for their technical employees to travel to Brazil.


The surveyed firms were then asked to assess their outlook for international business.

The survey asked, “How do you feel about your company’s potential for international business in the future?” On a 5-point scale ranging from very pessimistic to very optimistic, the most frequent response was somewhat optimistic, with very optimistic coming in second. The survey also asked, “How do you feel about your company’s future success for exporting to new markets?” On the same 5-point scale, the firms’ most frequent response again was somewhat optimistic, with very optimistic coming in second.


The following information was gathered from a series of questions about international business activities:

  • 17% of the surveyed companies exported to new markets in the past year. The specific countries are as follows: Brazil, Greece, China, Poland, France, Sweden, Taiwan, and Singapore.
  • 17 % of the surveyed companies exported to new distributors or channels of distribution in the past year. These new channels include: Brazil, Thailand, Ireland, China, South Korea, Britain, France, Sweden, Taiwan, and Singapore.
  • 35 % of the firms are planning on entering a new international market in 2004. These countries include: Chile, Argentina, Vietnam, China, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, India, Australia, and Brazil.
  • 17% of the firms have an e-commerce enabled website but only about 2% of sales are done via the Internet for the e-commerce enabled firms. However, one firm reported 60% of their business is done online.
  • The responding firms, approximately 5% of the known exporters in Washtenaw County, employ an estimated 753 people whose jobs are directly related to exporting.
  • 17% of the firms have experienced difficulty in obtaining visas for overseas visitors of the company to visit the U.S. Those firms that experienced visa difficulties reported 21 separate issues.
  • The estimated total number of days that overseas guests visited the surveyed businesses was 419 days. With an estimated travel expense of $150 per day for Washtenaw County, the international visitors to the surveyed firms brought in approximately $62,850, alone.[24]
  • The firms were then asked a series of questions about the United States’ international trade policy. On a 5-point scale ranging from great decline to great increase, the firms were asked, “Since the signing of NAFTA in 1992, what changes have you seen in your export sales?” The most frequent answer was no change, with some increase filling in the rest of the responses.
  • In response to supporting additional Free Trade Agreements such as FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) or CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement), 17% of the firms supported these additions.

A weak U.S. dollar is expected to have a positive impact on exports. While U.S. consumers feel the negative pains of a weak U.S. dollar, goods and services are less expensive for foreign consumers and businesses making U.S. products more attractive. Additionally, a large number of the Washtenaw County’s exports are technology related. Due to the world’s growing dependence upon technology, specifically computer software and hardware, demand for Washtenaw County’s products should remain strong.

While there are a limited number of statistics to track the effect of dollar value on exports the Institute for Supply Management (formerly the National Association of Purchasing Management), the largest supply management association in the world, does provide economic outlooks for both the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors. In 2004, purchasing and supply executives reported to the ISM that non-manufacturing business activity continued to increase at a steady but slow rate over the past year. Within the non-manufacturing sectors there was “continued positive business conditions but with continued concern about inflationary pressures.”[25] ISM also reports that in 2004, New Export Orders for non-manufacturing products are increasing.[26] Further, according to the Michigan Manufacturers Association (MMA), industrial machinery and computers account for 20.7% of Michigan’s exports, a positive fact for Washtenaw County.[27]

In terms of Michigan’s industries’ contribution towards state growth, the State of Michigan has posted positive numbers due to both the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors. From 1992 to 2000, the average real GSP (Gross State Product) growth rate for Michigan was 3.8%, the average manufacturing real growth rate was 4.7%, and the average real GSP growth excluding manufacturing was 3.1%. Manufacturing’s contribution to real GSP growth during this time period was 32.1%.[28]

Economic outlooks continue to indicate a strong future for Washtenaw County exports, especially with the assumption that the computer technology industry will be able to weather a fluctuating domestic and world economy. With its main exporting sectors in the computer and medical/lab equipment industries, Washtenaw County exporters will look towards new developing markets for international sales as well as strengthening ties to existing developed markets. Michigan and the United States have benefited greatly from Washtenaw County’s export success and strength in computer and equipment sales.


Educational Institutions

Education as a Reverse Export

Although focusing on traditional exports, such as computer software, when assessing Washtenaw County’s international economic impact is standard, educational institutions also contribute to the county’s global influence and local economy. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration ranks international education as the United States fifth largest service sector export bringing in over $12 billion to the U.S. economy. Michigan ranks number eight in international students hosting 22,873 students for the 2002/3 school year and they added an estimated $430.8 million to Michigan’s economy.[29] Asian students comprise 51% of international students studying in the U.S. and the top countries of origin are India, China, and South Korea.[30] Universities and colleges in Washtenaw County bring in a considerable amount of economic revenue through international students, which in turn benefits businesses that would not normally profit from international sales. Industries such as retail trade, real estate, accommodation and food services, entertainment, and recreation all profit from this unique form of exporting.

Overview of International Students in Washtenaw County

In Washtenaw County there are a total of six educational institutions with international students. Eastern Michigan University and the University of Michigan are the two public universities. There are three small, private institutions that include Ave Maria, Cleary College and Concordia College, and one community college, Washtenaw County Community College. According to the 2004 survey conducted by the Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center and the 2003 Open Doors Report, the annual report on international education published by the Institute of International Education, Washtenaw County had a total of 7,229 international undergraduate and graduate students for the 2002/2003 school year. The University of Michigan had the most international students with a count of 4,601. Washtenaw County Community College came in second with an international student population of 1,370. Eastern Michigan was not far behind with 1,214 students. Concordia College, Cleary College and Ave Maria had a combined population of 44 international students. As of 2003, the University of Michigan had the sixth largest enrollment of international students in the nation.[31]

The total money spent by international students (including tuition, books, and living expenses) at all educational institutions in Washtenaw County accounts for an estimated $159,730,300 for the 2002/2003 school year. In Open Doors’ financial calculations, financial support that the U.S. gives to international students is taken into account, an important notation that if disregarded, could seriously inflate the net contribution to the U.S. economy. International students in Michigan received financial support from the U.S. for almost 1/3 of their school and living expenses.[32] Open Doors also takes into account the living expenses of international students’ dependents. 14% of international students in Michigan were married with 85% of the spouses living in the U.S. for the 2002/2003 school year.[33] Both Ave Maria and Washtenaw Community College did not report their international student statistics to be included in the Open Doors report, and estimates were therefore made by the individual institutions’ estimates.

The average cost of one-year total spent at the University of Michigan was estimated at $38,286 per international student for the 2004/2005 school year, making it the most expensive institution in the county. Open Doors reports that the estimated total contribution by University of Michigan international students was $117,522,700. Eastern Michigan University comes in second with a total of $27,725,900. Concordia and Cleary contribute an estimated $103,500 and $65,700 respectively to Washtenaw County’s economy. Finally, Ave Maria and Washtenaw Community College’s estimated contributions total $612,500 and $13,700,000, not taking into account U.S. support and dependent living expenses. While the bulk of that money goes directly to the educational institutions in the form of tuition, an average of 40% goes into the local economy.[34]

The majority of the international students attending educational institutions in Washtenaw County come from India, with an estimated 832 students, and China with an estimated 753 students. There are an overwhelming number of students coming from Asian countries, which coincides with the statistic that 51% of international students in the U.S. were Asian for the 2002/3 school year. The top six most popular countries of origin for international students in Washtenaw County include China, India, Korea, Taiwan, Canada, and Japan.[35] The top countries of origin for international students in Washtenaw County correspond with the top countries of origin for the entire U.S.

Significance of International Students: Educational Export Economic Impact

The economic impact of international students is significant in Washtenaw County because it connects businesses that would not normally have international perspective to the global economy. International sales can be difficult if not impossible for small retailers and service providers. Yet, the substantial number of international students enrolled in Washtenaw County educational institutions provides an opportunity for increased business through existing sales channels. Additionally, most money coming from international students into the county comes from offshore, which means the money spent was not generated inside of Washtenaw County.

The large number of international students also has a positive effect on Washtenaw County employment. The U.S. Department of Commerce estimates that every $35,000 worth of exports creates one job. Since the University of Michigan is the county’s largest employer with over 25,000 employees, it is likely that a number of jobs in the educational field are supported directly by international students. This number is difficult to pinpoint however, due to international staff working in a variety of departments and that some staff devotes only part of their time to international students. While it is difficult to estimate the impact of international students’ additional expenses outside of tuition, the high level of total economic impact suggests international students support a number of workers in fields that conventionally do not benefit from exporting.

Future Trends in International Student Enrollment and Educational Exporting

According to Open Doors, after 5 years of steady growth, the number of international students in the U.S. grew only by .06% in 2002-03 over the previous year totaling 586,323 students.[36] Similar trends occurred in the State of Michigan and enrollment was actually down less than one percent bringing the number of international students in Michigan to 22,873, for the 2002-03 school year.[37]

For more than 50 years, U.S. educational institutions have been required to maintain data about their foreign students and exchange visitors. Government records of the data was previously inefficient and paper driven. Due to heightened security in the U.S., however, Congress mandated that by August 1, 2003, all foreign students and exchange visitors be entered into a central and automated system called the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). Under SEVIS, schools are required to submit basic information about their international students such as address, degree program, and expected date of graduation.[38]

Another registration program that affects international students in Michigan is the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS). The Department of Homeland Security describes NSEERS as “…a national registry for temporary foreign visitors (non-immigrant aliens) arriving from certain countries, or who meet a combination of intelligence-based criteria, and are identified as presenting an elevated national security concern.” Students from the following countries are subjected to special registration, fingerprinting & photographing upon entering the U.S.: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Egypt, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Lebanon, Morocco, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.[39]

As expected, enrollment numbers from some of the aforementioned countries have notably decreased. Enrollment from the Middle East was down 10%, Indonesia down 10%, Thailand down 15%, and Malaysia down 11%. Of the top 20 sending countries, 13 experienced a decrease in sending numbers.[40] These decreases however have made way for some major sending countries to increase their enrollment numbers in U.S. educational institutions. India, China, and South Korea, the top three sending countries saw increased enrollment numbers of 12%, 2%, and 5% respectively. Washtenaw County has seen little change in international student enrollment, mirroring the U.S. and Michigan. The county also has similar numbers in regards to international student country of origin, with an overwhelming number coming from Asian countries.[41]

The impact of SEVIS and NSEERS may present itself in the future; prospective international students may choose not to apply to educational institutions in the United States due to application difficulty and entrance discomfort. Respondents from the educational institutions have found some of their students to oppose these systems as they feel their anonymity and rights are being infringed upon. According to the respondents, international students have also expressed discomfort at the borders when entering the United States, specifically when re-entering following a vacation or home visit. These policies could therefore create a financial impact on the educational institutions of the county. The respondents of the survey however, noted that in most cases, domestic students would simply fill the spots that international students once held.

Despite any effect from new visa policies, Washtenaw County schools will continue to advocate for their institution as a higher learning opportunity for international students. Many of the universities and colleges belong to or are planning on joining educational consortiums such as NAFSA: Association of International Educators to promote their institution abroad. Further, many of the schools have partnerships with education institutions abroad to exchange students.

Do you want more information?

Click here to see available product specific market research for your product.


Footnotes

[1] Population Division. U.S. Census Bureau. http://eire.census.gov/popest/data/cities/tables/SUB-EST2003-01.xls .
[2] Trade Promotion Authority. International Trade Administration. U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.tpa.gov/statetpa/MItpa.pdf .
[3] 1997 Economic Census. U.S. Census Bureau.
[4] Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center. U.S. Department of Commerce.
[5] 2004 Canada Country Commercial Guide. U.S. Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[6] Strategis Trade Data Online. http://strategis.ic.gc.ca .
[7] 2004 Canada Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[8] Ibid.
[9] 2004 Mexico Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Eastern Michigan University Information and Communication Technology & U.S. Export Assistance Center. http://www.emich.edu/ict_usa/INTERNATIONAL.htm .
[12] 2004 China Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Ibid.
[15] 2004 Australia Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Ibid.
[18] 2004 France Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[19] Ibid.
[20] U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Export Assistance Center
[21] 2004 France Country Commercial Guide. U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State.
[22] Ibid.
[23] Ibid.
[24] U.S. General Services Administration.
[25] Institute for Supply Management. http://www.ism.ws .
[26] Ibid.
[27] Michigan Manufacturers Association. http://www.mma-net.org .
[28] National Association of Manufacturers. http://www.nam.org .
[29] 2003 Open Doors Report. Institute of International Education.
[30] Ibid.
[31] Ibid.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Ibid.
[34] Ibid.
[35] 2004 Ypsilanti U.S. Export Assistance Center Survey.
[36] 2003 Open Doors Report. Institute of International Education.
[37] Ibid.
[38] U.S. Department of Homeland Security. U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.
[39] Ibid.
[40] 2003 Open Doors Report. Institute of International Education.
[41] Ibid.

Date Updated: March 20, 2007

 

 

Copyright 2006 - Michigan District Export Council.  All rights reserved